An ad that unplugs a flood of nonprofit stupidity
|
Leave it to an ad agency to make sure nobody knows what you’re talking about, even when you’re talking about something everybody knows about. The winner they came up with is a nearly full-page newspaper print ad done for the Canadian Red Cross. It’s true that many fundraisers have struggled to communicate the crushing scope of the flooding in Pakistan. (There are some unfortunately predictable reasons for this; read about them here.) But the main reason donors aren’t pouring their donations into Pakistan like they did with Haiti is because the disaster there seems less real. You might think a solution to that problem would be to find a way to make it more real, wouldn’t you? Well, the ad agency working for the Canadian Red Cross this time took a rather different approach: make it less real. Yep, the Geniuses of Abstraction felt the best way to use nearly a full newspaper page of space wasn’t a heart-wrenching photo, wasn’t a headline that captured the pain and urgency of the crisis, wasn’t copy that pulled the reader viscerally into the situation. Their solution was a cute visual pun. Actually, I’m not sure it even rises to the level of a pun. In what way do letters falling down the page recall a catastrophic flood that devastated the lives of something like a third of one of Earth’s most populous nations? The little red cross acting as an umbrella? Isn’t that kind of like illustrating the Haiti earthquake by showing a picture of maracas? And if all that weren’t bad enough, the tiny bit of copy makes several basic rookie copywriting mistakes:
An abstract slogan, followed by two look-at-us sentences. Not how you motivate giving. It’s never worked before and it’s not going to work this time. I understand the frustration. This was a big disaster. Not nearly enough funds were raised. Sadly, given the circumstances, even a well-constructed ad wouldn’t have performed the way it should. But no matter how frustrated you get, don’t call in the abstract fairy dust that the ad agencies sell. It’s just going to waste time, money and good will. Update: this ad has won an award! So it has accomplished its purpose. Too bad that’s about all it will ever do. |





Red Cross "Wash Away" ad.
It would help me to know 1) the cost of the design and printing of the ad and 2) how much was brought it by it. The critical evaluation of it as 'bad' is interesting and many points seemed valid, but I would like to know the 'brass tack' facts that support the critique. i.e. 'The ad cost 1 million and only brought in $5.00'. Thanks, GregRobin.
what's the hang-up with ad agencies?
While Jeff makes some very good points about the poor ads that he highlights in this section, it gets a little dull to have to read his constant attacks on advertising agencies. Does he truly hate all advertising agencies? Because his comments seem to imply that. Is he saying that no agency has ever managed to produce a great fundraising ad? Because some of the fabulous examples on this website were produced by advertising agencies. Please confine your comments to the actual ad rather than disparaging the entire ad industry. It seems very small-minded to me.
Post new comment