Feed the Children’s ‘baby box’
Previous |
Back to item list | Next ![]() |
|
The Feed the Children ‘baby box’ press advertisement. Below: An arrangement of cards, photgraphs and goodwill messges to the mothers of Bosnia from Feed the Children’s donors.
This case study appears in these showcases
|
SOFII's viewThis is a story of classic product development. The baby box was devised specifically to respond to the need to maintain giving at a time when donor interest was flagging and the idea for it came from the best possible place – the charity workers on the front line. But the logic behind this initiative was unarguable and it proved to have lasting public appeal. Medium of communication:Press advertising.Type of charity:Children, youth and family, poverty/social justice.Target audience:single gift.Creator/originator:Burnett Associates Limited Name of exhibitor:Maxine Delahunty/ SOFII homeless sectionDate of first appearance:unknown.Summary/objectives:In the middle of the civil war in former Yugoslavia, after months of enterprising and very successful donor recruitment and development by Feed the Children UK (later renamed as Children’s Aid Direct) response levels, perhaps not surprisingly, began to fall off as donors became increasingly used to seeing images from the war zone on their nightly television broadcasts. Feed the Children’s agency, Burnett Associates, realised that they had to do something dramatic to revive interest in their client and its work. So they set about creating a new fundraising product, built around a classic ‘shopping list’ approach. Background:In the mid 1990s, when the civil war at its height, aid agencies on the ground were allocated specific areas of responsibility and Feed the Children found itself charged with providing for mothers with young babies. At this time response to their sustained press recruitment campaign was beginning to show signs of serious tiredness, so Burnett Associates, with the support of FTC, sent one of its account managers to Bosnia to assess the situation. One of the field workers he met said ‘What each mother really needs here is a box containing just the basics of baby care – safety pins, nappies, cream, cotton wool and such like, the basic necessities of life that are in such short supply here.’ From this comment, the idea of the baby box grew. Special Characteristics:This is a medium value single gift product with opportunities for additional engagement and ongoing involvement. Influence/Impact:Many other charities particularly in the UK were looking at this time to recruit monthly donors. The success of the baby box product was frequently cited as an explanation for the number of monthly giving clubs and schemes that sprang up at this time. Details:All media for FTC’s press advertisements at the time were continually and rigorously tested. The baby box offer out-performed the control by many times. Results:Not specifically available, but they were spectacular and the cost of donor recruitment ‘off the page’ dropped significantly after the product appeared. Merits:It’s a great, classic product that has massive donor appeal because it so clearly meets the most commonly asked donor question, ‘Where does my money go and what does it achieve?’ Other relevant information:These baby boxes were real. For each box bought by a donor a real box stuffed with necessities was delivered to a needy parent in Bosnia. In addition to the listed enclosures (see ad opposite) donors could also put in a special message, as an additional involvement device. Many did, including photographs, simple cards and often touching personal messages. Many Bosnian mothers replied to these, via the charity Feed the Children. These exchanges of goodwill messages were frequently covered in the national and local press, which brought in many new donors for FTC at no extra cost. |


Previous



Results?
I find it irresponsible to put a direct-response strategy on your website that has no attached results to it. "Not specifically available, but they were spectacular..." What does that really mean? Nothing. This is not general advertising folks. It should be the standard of your website not to accept submissions unless there are concrete results attached to it. In addition they should be compared to either previous results of other DM result the organization is experiencing or direct head to head tests.
SOFII's policy on results
Thank you for your comment.
Like you, we appreciate the importance of actual results and agree it's difficult to judge the relative effectiveness of a specific fundraising initiative without them. However, try as we might it's not always possible to get details of results and their absence doesn't mean that a campaign is not worth studying or is impossible to learn from. Whatever the ideal, we have to live in the real world. Getting information of any kind for exhibits on SOFII is difficult. If in the absence of tangible results we are told that something worked very well, or whatever superlative might be attached, we tend to take that at face value. If someone wants to copy a fundraising technique or to decide whether or not to test a technique some general guidance on the effectiveness of the original is likely to be better than nothing.
Particularly when featuring fundraising from years or even decades ago, actual results can be very hard to find. That certainly does not mean there's nothing we can learn from fundraising down the ages.
If you are prepared to share results from your effective fundraising please do let us know. All instructive case histories of fundraising are welcome, and the moreso when accompanied by carefully documented results.
Best wishes,
Ken, SOFII trustee
Post new comment