Greenpeace UK’s ‘forget it’ pack reactivation mailings

An intriguing message, powerfully presented. Who wouldn’t be grateful to just be able to forget the tedious chore of membership renewal? And as the envelope is opened, below, the answer seems to be...reassuringly positive!
An intriguing message, powerfully presented. Who wouldn’t be grateful to just be able to forget the tedious chore of membership renewal? And as the envelope is opened, below, the answer seems to be...reassuringly positive!

The letter inside then explains, in full detail, how forgetting all about the tedious task of membership renewal really is not just a possibility, it’s a certainty, once you've signed the accompanying Bankers’ Order.
The letter inside then explains, in full detail, how forgetting all about the tedious task of membership renewal really is not just a possibility, it’s a certainty, once you've signed the accompanying Bankers’ Order.

 


More case studies from Greenpeace


SOFII's view

It’s easy now to forget that as recently as 20 years ago giving by direct debit (aka electronic funds transfer, PAC and autogiro) was a comparative rarity. The paradigm for most fundraisers with large donor bases was the annual renewal cycle, with a renewal ‘banker’ mail pack being sent out on a specific (usually anniversary) date, followed by up to a dozen ‘reminders’ all with increasing urgency, which tried to entice or cajole donors into continuing their support. This costly, wasteful system is still the norm for many organisations, particularly in North America, but it is dying out as the obvious benefits of automatic electronic renewal are increasingly understood and appreciated. This is the first mailing from a particularly good example of a renewal series, from Greenpeace UK.

Medium of communication:
Direct mail.

Type of charity:
Environmental/animals.

Target audience:
Individuals, planned gift.

Country of origin:
UK.

Creator/originator:

Burnett Associates working with Annie Moreton and Charlotte Grimshaw at Greenpeace UK.

Name of exhibitor:
Maxine Delahunty, SOFII homeless section

Date of first appearance:
1991.
Summary/objectives:

This exhibit is part of a series of increasingly strident requests to donors, to renew their support for the coming year and, more importantly, to switch to an automated payment method.

Background:

Greenpeace UK at the time had a large but very flat supporter base, most people were just paying an annual subscription fee of £15.00, which was all they had ever been asked for. This was before the launch of Greenpeace’s high value monthly giving scheme, Frontline. Renewal was seen as a key annual activity, with particular emphasis on trying to get supporters to sign banker’s orders (as in this example) or, later, direct debits. It was felt that after this inertia would work in Greenpeace’s favour rather than against it, which was happening with the cash donation system that was prevalent at the time.

A bankers’ order (an order to your bankers, hence the position of the apostrophe) is an instruction to your bank to make a fixed payment from your account on a given date. A direct debit is authority for the charity’s bank to literally reach in (electronically) to the bank account of your donor to remove a sum of money. Initially direct debits were fixed. Then they became variable (the amount can be changed by the charity, though the donor always has the right to object and have funds re-credited. The latest development is paperless direct debit, particularly handy for telephone campaigns.

These developments in the mechanics of fund collection are seen as tedious and administrative by many fundraisers, but they have had more impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of fundraising than all the world’s creative directors, piled on top of each other, have had since time began
 

Special Characteristics:

Very ‘in your face’, very Greenpeace.

Influence/Impact:

These were expensive to produce and took a lot of organising, so provided a powerful incentive to move to regular monthly giving first by standing order, then by direct debit.

Details:

Results are not available but this series worked much harder than the renewal series it replaced.

Merits:

The entire series is a good example of an important fundraising mechanism in the process of being replaced by a better way of doing things.

Other relevant information:

Please contact Carolina if you can add any detail to this exhibit, or to any of the following exhibits.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Fill in the blank

Thank you

SOFII gratefully acknowledges the generous and catalytic support of the Joffe Foundation, UK, which has made possible SOFII's growth and development to date.

'My Trust is delighted with its investment in SOFII. We are very pleased that we have been able to be of assistance in the launch of this important initiative.'
Lord Joel Joffe.

About SOFII

SOFII is supervised by The SOFII Foundation, a registered charity in the UK, No 1124743.

SOFII’s development director is Sue Kershaw. She can be reached at sue@sofii.org

'We love SOFII. Next year we hope to help again.' 
Lynne, HMA, Vancouver.

© The SOFII Foundation 2010. http://www.sofii.org.

 

 

Get in touch

Once you have registered you will automatically be kept up to date with how SOFII develops. For any other queries please visit our contact page.